No- when I went through, it asked specifically the type of setting
the stone was in.
It's for any purchase of any diamond jewelry (watches, rings,
necklaces, bracelets, earrings, etc) from 1994 until March 2006. It
did state that the total amount people receive from it will depend
on what the settlement is, and how much the value of your purchase
was.
They stated also that if the reimbursment is less than $10, you
won't receive it, because it will go to cover costs. They also
pointed out that it's unlikely that purchases of under $100 will
qualify for a reimbursement.
There is no guarentee you'll get anything back, though, but it
doesn't hurt to try. My ring was purchased in December 97 or January
98, and was $999.
--- In michigantightwads@
<motherearth429@
>
> Am I understanding this correct that it is for the purchase of
loose diamonds only?
> Lisa
>
> --- In michigantightwads@
> <melissaaamodt@
> >
> > Just thought I would pass this on. DeBeers is part of a lawsuit
in
> > which anyone buying a diamond between 1994-2006 is entitled to a
30%
> > rebate of your purchase price.
> >
> > All info, forms, etc is online. The date to fill out and turn in
for
> a
> > refund is May 19 2008.
> >
> > https://diamondscla
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with
Yahoo! Search.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar